Arab World English Journal (AWEJ) Proceedings of 2nd MEC TESOL Conference 2020 Pp.133-149
DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.24093/awej/MEC2.10
Evaluation of Hypermedia Tools in Terms of Usability Heuristics for
English Language Teaching
Vikas Rao Naidu(Correspondent author)
Department of Computing
Middle East College, Muscat, Oman
Email: vikas@mec.edu.om
Shyamala Srinivas
Department of Management Studies
Middle East College, Muscat, Oman
Mahmood Al Raisi
Department of Computing
Middle East College, Muscat, Oman
Vishal Dattana
Department of Computing
Middle East College, Muscat, Oman
Abstract:
The technology-assisted teaching and learning process has seen a spurt in growth in the last two decades. The education technology field has rapidly embraced new tools and techniques to enhance the student learning experience. With the evolution of multimedia elements such as digital images, audio, video, graphics, and animation, the learning supported by technology has made learning flexible and accessible in terms of time and place. With Wi-Fi enabled campuses, it is much easier for students to learn using their smart devices enabled by hypermedia content. Hypermedia, also known as active media, is the multimedia content that brings in interactivity, where the user can interact with the system, rather than viewing the content in passive mode. This helps in generating a dialogue between the system and user, sustaining user interest. Some examples of hypermedia are interactive quizzes, games, interactive videos, etc. This study aims to investigate and evaluate four interactive tools, namely FluentU, Duolingo, Livemocha, and Hello English, which are designed for language learning. A qualitative assessment of the applications, including a review of past literature on language learning using tools, was undertaken. The expert evaluation or assessment was done using Jakob Nielsen’s ten heuristics or design guidelines. The objective was to compare the applications by measuring their usability against the standard heuristics. The goal of any usability study is user satisfaction. Through this interface evaluation, the researchers have concluded for designers that could be considered during future development of hypermedia-based tools.
Keywords: language learning, HCI, interactive, usability, evaluation, and heuristics
Cite as: Naidu, V. R., Srinivas, S., Al Raisi, M., & Dattana, V. (2020). Evaluation of Hypermedia Tools in Terms of Usability Heuristics for English Language Teaching.Arab World English Journal(AWEJ). Proceedings of 2nd MEC TESOLConference 2020:133-149.
DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.24093/awej/MEC2.10
References
Agarwal, A., Naidu, V. R., & Al Mamari, R. (2019). a Framework To Enhance Learning Experience in Flipped Classroom Based on Student Accountability Towards Active Participation. EDULEARN19 Proceedings, 1(July), 1569–1577. https://doi.org/10.21125/edulearn.2019.0464
Al Kalbani, B., Rao Naidu, V., Rani Gupta, R., & Al Sawafi, A. (2020). Teaching Mathematics Through Online Collaborative Environment In The Higher Education Context. In IJAEDU-International E-Journal of Advances in Education: Vol. VI (Issue 17). https://doi.org/10.18768/IJAEDU.789432
Al Mahdi, Z., Rao Naidu, V., & Kurian, P. (2019). Analyzing the Role of Human Computer Interaction Principles for E-Learning Solution Design (pp. 41–44). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-01659-3_6
Al Mamari, R., Naidu, V. R., & Agarwal, A. (2019). a Proposed Framework for Effective Usage of Social Media in Higher Education Establishments. EDULEARN19 Proceedings, 1(July), 7337–7341. https://doi.org/10.21125/edulearn.2019.1755
Becker, A. S., Rodriguez, J.C., Estrada, V., & Davis, A. (2016). Innovating Language Education: An NMC Horizon Project Strategic Brief (Vol. 3.1). Austin, Texas: The New Media Consortium. Available at http://cdn.nmc.org/media/2016-nmc-strategic-brief-language_ed.pdf
Blake, R. (2016). Technology and the four skills. Language Learning & Technology, 20(2), 129–142. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10125/44465 Blyth C. (2018). Immersive technologies and language learning. Foreign Language Annals, 51(1), 225–232. Available at https://doi.org/10.1111/flan.12327
Brick, B., & Cervi-Wilson, T. (2015). Technological diversity: A case study into language learners’ mobile technology use inside and outside the classroom. In K. Borthwick, E. Corradini, & A. Dickens (Eds.), 10 years of the LLAS elearning symposium: Case studies in good practice (pp. 21-30). Dublin: Research-publishing.net. doi: 10.14705/rpnet.2015.000264
Chapelle, C.A., & Jamieson, J. (2008). Tips for Teaching with CALL: Practical Approaches to Computer-Assisted Language Learning. White Plains, NY: Pearson-Longman.
Chapelle, C. A., & Voss, E. (2016). 20 years of technology and language assessment in Language Learning & Technology. Language Learning & Technology, 20(2), 116–128. Available at http://dx.doi.org/10125/44464
Cockton, G. (2020). Usability Evaluation | The Encyclopedia of Human-Computer Interaction, 2nd Ed. Interaction Design Foundation. https://www.interaction-design.org/literature/book/the-encyclopedia-of-human-computer-interaction-2nd-ed/usability-evaluation
Dix, A., Finlay, J., Abowd, G., Beale, R. (2004). Human-Computer Interaction (3rded.). London: Pearson
Felix, U. (2008). The unreasonable effectiveness of CALL: What have we learned in two decades of research? ReCALL, 20(2), 141-161. doi: 10.1017/S0958344008000323
Garrett, N. (2009). Computer-assisted language learning trends and issues revisited: Integrating innovation. The Modern Language Journal, 93(s1), 719-740. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-4781.2009.00969.x
Godwin-Jones, R. (2015). The evolving roles of language teachers: Trained coders, local researchers, global citizens. Language Learning & Technology, 19(1), 10–22. Available at http://dx.doi.org/10125/44395
Gawande, V. (2010). Effective Use of HCI in ELearning. The Sixth International Conference on eLearning for Knowledge-Based Society, Thailand
Godwin-Jones, R. (2016). Looking back and ahead: 20 years of technologies for language learning. Language Learning & Technology, 20(2), 5–12. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10125/44457
Godwin-Jones, R. (2017a). Data-informed language learning. Language Learning & Technology, 21(3), 9–27. doi: 10125/44629
Godwin-Jones, R. (2017b). Smartphones and language learning. Language Learning & Technology, 21(2), 3–17. https://dx.doi.org/10125/44607
Golonka, E. M., Bowles, A. R., Frank, V.M., Richardson, D. L., & Freynik, S. (2014). Technologies for foreign language learning: a review of technology types and their effectiveness. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 27(1), 70-105. doi: 10.1080/09588221.2012.700315
Gómez, R. Y., Caballero, D.C., & Sevillano, J. L. (2014). Heuristic Evaluation on Mobile Interfaces: A New Checklist. The Scientific World Journal. 2014. 434326. 10.1155/2014/434326.
Haugh, M. (2017). Translation technology is useful, but should not replace learning languages [Web log post]. Retrieved from https://theconversation.com/translation-technology-is-useful-but-should-not-replace-learning-languages-85384
Hong, Z. W., Huang, Y. M., Hsu, M., & Shen, W. W. (2016). Authoring robot-assisted instructional materials for improving learning performance and motivation in EFL classrooms. Educational Technology & Society, 19(1), 337–349. Retrieved from https://www.j-ets.net/ETS/journals/19_1/27.pdf
Hubbard, P. (2013). Making a case for learner training in technology enhanced language learning environments. CALICO Journal, 30(2), 163–178. doi: 10.11139/cj.30.2.163
John, C. (2018). The Evolution and Impact of Technology in Language Education, Technology and the Curriculum Summer 2018. Retrieved from https://techandcurriculum.pressbooks.com/chapter/technology-assisted-language-learning/
Jones, A., Kukulska-Hulme, A., Norris, L., Gaved, M., Scanlon, E., Jones, J., & Brasher, A. (2017). Supporting immigrant language learning on smartphones: A field trial. Studies in the Education of Adults, 49(2), 228-252. doi: 10.1080/02660830.2018.1463655
Joyce, G., Lilley, M., Barker, T., & Jefferies, A. (2019). Heuristic Evaluation for Mobile Applications: Extending a Map of the Literature. 10.1007/978-3-319-94947-5_2.
Kern, R. (2006). Perspectives on technology in learning and teaching languages. TESOL Quarterly, 40(1), 183-210. doi: https://doi.org/10.2307/40264516
Kessler, G. (2018). Technology and the future of language teaching. Foreign Language Annals, 51(1), 205–218. Available at https://doi.org/10.1111/flan.12318
Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated Learning, Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: University of Cambridge Press.
Mohammed, Q. A., Naidu, V. R., Hasan, R., Mustafa, M., & Jesrani, K. A. (2019). Digital Education Using Free And Open Source Tools To Enhance Collaborative Learning. IJAEDU- International E-Journal of Advances in Education, 13, 50–57. https://doi.org/10.18768/ijaedu.531636
Mustafa, M., Naidu, V. R., Mohammed, Q. A., Jesrani, K. A., Hasan, R., & Hadrami, G. Al. (2019). A Framework For Collaborative And Active Learning For Enhancing Student Engagement. IJAEDU- International E-Journal of Advances in Education, 83–93. https://doi.org/10.18768/ijaedu.531644
Naidu, V. R., Al Balushi, H., & Bhatia, S. (2017). Effectiveness of Free & Open Source Tools To Enhance Game Based Learning Experience in School Education. EDULEARN17 Proceedings, 1(July), 6604–6609. https://doi.org/10.21125/edulearn.2017.2505
Naidu, V. R., Singh, B., Farei, K. Al, & Suqri, N. Al. (2020). Machine Learning for Flipped Teaching in Higher Education—A Reflection (pp. 129–132). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-32902-0_16
Naidu, V. R., Singh, B., Hasan, R., & Al Hadrami, G. (2017). Learning Analytics For Smart Classrooms In Higher Education. In IJAEDU-International E-Journal of Advances in Education (Vol. 3). http://ijaedu.ocerintjournals.org
Nielsen, J. (1994). 10 Heuristics for User Interface Design: Article by Jakob Nielsen. Nielsen Norman Group. https://www.nngroup.com/articles/ten-usability-heuristics/
Poloju, K. K., & Naidu, V. R. (2020). Impact of E-tools in Teaching and Learning for Undergraduate Students. In H. S. Saini, R. K. Singh, M. Tariq Beg, & J. S. Sahambi (Eds.), Innovations in Electronics and Communication Engineering (pp. 783–790). Springer Singapore.
Reinders, H., & White, C. (2016). 20 years of autonomy and technology: How far have we come and where to next? Language Learning & Technology, 20(2), 143–154. http://dx.doi.org/10125/44466
Sharma, A., & Naidu, V. R. (2020). a Study on Emerging Trends To Enhance Learning Experience in Higher Education Institutions. INTED2020 Proceedings, 1(March), 7391–7396. https://doi.org/10.21125/inted.2020.1974
Son, J.B. & Park, J.Y. (2012). Intercultural usability of language learning websites. International Journal of Pedagogies & Learning, 7(2), 135–141. https://doi.org/10.5172/ijpl.2012.7.2.135
Sydorenko, T., Hsieh, C., Ahn, S., & Arnold N. (2017). Foreign language learners’ beliefs about CALL: The case of a U.S. Midwestern university. CALICO Journal, 34(2), 196–218. https://doi.org/10.1558/cj.28226
Vogt, P., de Haas, M., de Jong, C., Baxter, P., & Krahmer, E. (2017). Child-robot interactions for second language tutoring to preschool children. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, Vol 11. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2017.00073
Wain, J., Timpe, L. V., & Oh, S. (2019). Pedagogic Principles in Digital Pragmatics Learning Materials: Learner Experiences and Perceptions. ETS Research Reports Series (1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1002/ets2.12270
Wang, Y. F., & Petrina, S. (2013). Using learning analytics to understand the design of an intelligent language tutor – Chatbot Lucy. (IJACSA) International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications, 4(11), 124-131. doi: 10.14569/IJACSA.2013.041117