Arab World English Journal (AWEJ) Volume 11. Number1 March 2020 Pp.114-123
EFL Teachers’ Attitudes towards the Use of Mobile Devices in Learning English
at A University in Vietnam
Loc Van Vo
Department of Research Affairs
Saigon University, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam
Linh Thuy Vo
Department of Research Affairs
Sai Gon University, Hue University of Foreign Languages
Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam
Among the sharp development of modern technology, mobile learning (M-learning) appears as the significantmark of technological revolution 4.0. It has seen that the exponential expansionof mobile devices accompanied their smart functions to support learners’ learning everywhere and every time. Thus, mobile-assisted language learning (MALL) is believed to serve learners’ English knowledge. Although learning through mobile devices is expected to apply appropriately toteaching and learning, teachers’attitudestowardsmobile learning needto be assessedseriously. This writing is to present EFL learners’ psychological preparation to perceive English mobile learning application at University X through a survey on 69 EFL teachers byquestionnaire,including tenstatements within 10 minutes. The investigationis carried out in the second semester of the school year 2018-2019. The qualitative approach was used to collect and analyze data, and findings showed that teachers have positive attitudes towards M-learning and its application at University X can be accepted firmly.
Keywords: attitude, mobile learning, Vietnam EFL students
Cite as: Vo, L. V. , & Vo, L. T. (2020). EFL Teachers’ Attitudes towards the Use of Mobile Devices in Learning English at A University in Vietnam. Arab World English Journal, 11 (1) 114-123.
Abu-Al-Aish, A., Love, S. (2013). Factors Influencing Students’ Acceptance of M-Learning: An Investigation in Higher Education. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning,14, (5). 83-107. DOI: 10.19173/irrodl.v14i5.1631
Chen, Y-S., Chen, T-S. & Huang, C-J. (2002). SOM. Spiral-Fat-Tree-Based on-Demand Multicast Protocol in a Wireless Ad-Hoc Network. Computer Communications, 25, (17), 1684–1695.
Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13, (3), 319-340.
Feser, J. (2010). MLearning Is Not eLearning on A Mobile Device |Float.https://gow ithoa t.com/2010 /04/mlearning-is-not-elearning-on-amobile-device/.
Iqbal, S. & Bhatti Z. A. (2015), An Investigation of University Student Readiness towards M-learning using Technology Acceptance Model. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning. 16, (4).
Kuciapski, M. (2016). Students’ Acceptance of m-Learning for Higher Education – UTAUT Model Validation. Information Systems: Development, Research, Applications, Education, 264,155-166.
Lefievre, V. (2012). Gender Differences in Acceptance by Students of Training Software for Office Tools. ATINER’s Conference Paper Series, No: EDU2012-0138 Gender. https://www.atiner.gr/papers/EDU 2012-0138.pdf.
Naismith, L., Lonsdale, P., Vavoula, G., and Sharples, M. (2004). Literature Review in Mobile Technologies and Learning. Futurelab Series, University of Birmingham. Available at: <https://lra.le.ac.uk/jspui/bitst ream/2381/8132/4/ %5B08%5DMo bile_ Review%5B1%5D.pdf>
Napitupulu, D., Kadar, J. A. &Jati, R. K. (2017). Validity Testing of Technology Acceptance Model Based on Factor Analysis Approach. Indonesian Journal of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, 5, (3), 697-704-697. DOI: 10.11591/ijeecs.v5.i3.
Ngo, T. V. K. &Gwangyong, G. (2014). Factors influencing mobile-learning adoption intention: an empirical investigation in high education. (Ph.D. Thesis).
O’Malley, C., Vavoula, G., Glew, J., Taylor, J., Sharples, M., &Lefrere, P. (2003). Guidelines for learning/teaching/tutoring in a mobile environment. MOBIlearn Deliverable, 4. Retrieved from: https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/E J932239.pdf.
Pollara, P. C. (2011). “Mobile learning in higher education: a glimpse and a comparison of student and faculty readiness, attitudes and perceptions.” LSU Doctoral Dissertations. 2349. http://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschooldissertations/2349.
Quinn, C. (2000). mLearning: Mobile, wireless, in your pocket learning. LineZine, Fall 2000. Retrieved August 28, 2007, from http://www.linezine.com/2.1/features/cqm m wi yp.htm.
Raaij, V. E.M. & Schepers, J.J.L. (2008). The Acceptance and Use of a Virtual Learning Environment in China. Computers & Education, 50, 838-852. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j. compedu.2006.09.001
Sharples, M. (2006). Big issues in mobile learning. Report. Nottingham: Kaleidoscope Research.
Tobias, J. L. Valiente, J., R., & Reich J., (2020). Studying Learner Behavior in Online Courses With Free Certificate Coupons: Results From Two Case Studies. International Review of research in Open and Distributed Learning. http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/issue/view/101/12Trinh,T. P. T. (2014). The exploitation of applications on mobile phones to support grade 12 students in high schools in mathematics self-study. The Vietnam Institute of educational sciences. Ph.D. Thesis.
Vo, T. L. (2017). Surveying and assessing Sai Gon university English pedagogy students’ attitudes towards M-learning. Scientific Journal of Saigon University. 33, (58), ISSN: 1859-3208.