Arab World English Journal (AWEJ) Special Issue on CALL Number 8. July 2022 Pp. 88-103
DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.24093/awej/call8.6
EFL Students’ Attitudes towards Using Online Learning during Covid-19:
Applying Technology Acceptance Model
Rabab Mizher
Department of English Language and Literature
Salt Faculty of Human Sciences
Al-Balqa Applied University, Salt, Jordan
Corresponding author: rabab_mizher@bau.edu.jo
Kholoud Amoush
Department of English Language and Literature
Salt Faculty of Human Sciences
Al-Balqa Applied University, Salt, Jordan
Asma Alwreikat
Department of Library and Information Management
Salt Faculty of Human Sciences
Al-Balqa Applied University, Salt, Jordan
Received: 04/07/2022 Accepted: 07/7/2022 Published: 07/25/2022
Abstract:
This study examined the attitudes toward online learning of EFL students by applying technology acceptance model (TAM) constructs along with the characteristics of the online learning system and the experience of online learning as external independent variables. The study used a quantitative approach. The researchers collected data by administering a questionnaire using Microsoft’s online form to the tertiary students who were studying for their Bachelor of Arts degree (B.A.) in the English Language and Literature Department at Al-Balqa Applied University – Jordan. . One hundred eighty-five students out of 602 responded to the questionnaire. The researchers used SPSS and Structural Equational Modeling (SEM – Smart PLS) to analyze the data. Among the findings, the characteristics of an online learning system significantly affected perceived usefulness (PU), perceived ease of use (PEOU), attitudes, and the behavioral intentions (BIs) of EFL learners. In contrast, EFL learners’ PEOU negatively affected their attitudes towards online learning and BIs. Finally, the attitudes of students who studied online for four semesters or more were negative compared to those who took less than four semesters online. These findings could be attributed to the supposedly temporary and rapid shift to online learning due to Covid-19 lockdown measures. This study is significant because it develops an understanding of tertiary EFL attitudes towards online learning. It also reflects on their behavioral intentions to utilize online learning after the pandemic. The researchers believe that this is the first study to examine EFL learners’ attitudes and BIs on using online learning during/after the pandemic in Jordan using TAM.
Keywords: Covid-19, EFL students’ attitudes, experience in online learning, online learning system characteristics,
technology acceptance model
Cite as: Mizher, R., Amoush, K.,& Alwreikat, A. (2022). EFL Students’ Attitudes towards Using Online Learning during Covid-19: Applying Technology Acceptance Model. Arab World English Journal (AWEJ) Special Issue on CALL (8).
DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.24093/awej/call8.6
References
Abdullah, F., & Ward, R. (2016). Developing a general extended technology acceptance model for elearning (GETAMEL) by analysing commonly used external factors. Computers in Human Behavior, 56, 238-256. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.11.036
Abramson , J., Dawson, M., & Stevens, J. (2015). An examination of the prior use of e-learning within an extended technology acceptance model and the factors that influence the behavioral intention of users to use m-learning. Sage Open, 5(4), 1-9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2158244015621114
Agudo-Peregrina, Á. F., Hernández-García, Á., & Pascual-Miguel, F. J. (2014). Behavioral intention, use behavior and the acceptance of electronic learning systems: Differences between higher education and lifelong learning. Computers in Human Behavior, 34, 301-314. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2013.10.035
Alharbi, S., & Drew, S. (2014). Using the technology acceptance model in understanding academics’ behavioural intention to use learning management systems. International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications, 5(1),143-155. http://dx.doi.org/10.14569/IJACSA.2014.050120
Almarabeh, T. (2014). Students’ perceptions of e-learning at the University of Jordan. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 9(3), 31-35. http://dx.doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v9i3.3347
Al-Okaily, M., Alqudah, H., Matar, A., Lutfi, A., & Taamneh, A. (2020). Dataset on the acceptance of e-learning system among universities students’ under the Covid-19 pandemic conditions. Data in Brief, 32,1-5. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dib.2020.106176
Al-Salman, S., & Haider, A. S. (2021). Jordanian university students’ views on emergency online. Online Learning, 25(1), 286-302. http://dx.doi.org/10.24059/olj.v25i1.2470
Al-Shboul, M. A., & Alsmadi, I. (2014). Challenges of utilizing e-learning systems in public universities in jordan. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 5(2), 4-10. http://dx.doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v5i2.1147
Al-Suqri, M. (2014). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease-of-use and faculty acceptance of electronic books: an empirical investigation of Sultan Qaboos University, Oman. Library Review, 63(4/5), 276-294. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/LR-05-2013-0062
Babin, B. J., Hair, J. F., & Boles, J. S. (2008). Publishing research in marketing journals using structural equation modeling. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 16(4), 279-286. http://dx.doi.org/10.2753/MTP1069-6679160401
Badran, A. (2014). New trends in higher education in Jordan 2014. Education, Economic and Development. 4th Arab-Turkish Congress of Social Sciences (pp. 1-28). Amman: Arab Thought Forum.
Bentler, P. M., & Chou, C.-P. (1987). Practical issues in structural modeling. Sociological Methods & Research, 16(1), 78-117. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0049124187016001004
Bougie, R., & Sekaran, U. (2019). Research methods for business: A skill building approach (8th Ed.). John Wiley & Sons.
Chou, I.-C. (2016). Reading for the purpose of responding to literature: EFL students’ perceptions of e-books. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 29(1), 1-20. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2014.881388
Davies, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(2), 319-340. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/249008
Education, M. o. (2022, January 15). Legislation/Arabic. Retrieved from Ministry of Higher Education in Jordan website: https://mohe.gov.jo/Ar/List/%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%A7%D9%86%D8%B8%D9%85%D8%A9
Farahat, T. (2012). Applying the technology acceptance model to online learning in the Egyptian universities. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 64, 95-104. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.11.012
Fornell , C., & Larcker, F. D. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Sage Publications, Inc., 18(1), 39-50. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3151312
Granic, A., & Marangunic, N. (2019). Technology acceptance model in educational context: A systematic literature review. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(5), 2572-2593. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12864
Hair, J. F., Hult , G. T., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt , M. (2021). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). SAGE Publications, Inc.
Haleman, K. N., & Yamat, H. (2021). The acceptance of e-learning among ESL primary school students during Covid-19. Journal of English Language Teaching and Applied Linguistics, 3(1), 8-18. http://dx.doi.org/10.32996/jeltal.2021.3.1.2
Hassanzadeh, A., Kanaani, F., & Elahi, S. (2012). A model for measuring e-learning systems success in universities. Expert Systems with Applications, 39(12), 10959-10966. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2012.03.028
Hrtoňová, N., Kohout, J., Rohlíková, L., & Zounek, J. (2014). Factors influencing acceptance of e-learning by teachers in the Czech Republic. Computers in Human Behavior, 51(B), 873-879. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.11.018
Hsiao, C.-H., & Tang, K.-Y. (2014). Explaining undergraduates’ behavior intention of e-textbook adoption: Empirical assessment of five theoretical models. Library Hi Tech, 32(1), 139-163. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/LHT-09-2013-0126
Hsieh, J. S., Huang, Y.-M., & Wu, W.-c. V. (2016). Technological acceptance of LINE in flipped EFL oral training. Computers in Human Behavior, 70, 178-190. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.12.066
Jiang, M. Y.-c., Jong, M. S.-y., Lau, W. W.-f., Meng, Y.-l., Chai, C.-s., & Chen, M. (2021). Validating the general extended technology acceptance model for e-learning: evidence from an online english as a foreign language course amid Covid-19. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 671615-. http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.671615
Kanwal, F., & Rehman, M. (2017). Factors affecting e-learning adoption in developing countries–empirical evidence from Pakistan’s higher education sector. IEEE Access, 5, 10968-10978. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2017.2714379
Liu, I.-F., Chen, M., Sun, Y., Wible, D., & Kuo, C.-H. (2010). Extending the TAM model to explore the factors that affect Intention to use an online learning community. Computers & Education, 54(2), 600-610. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2009.09.009
Mailizar, M., Burg, D., & Maulina, S. (2021). Examining university students’ behavioural intention to use e-learning during the Covid-19 pandemic: An extended TAM model. Education and Information Technologies, 26, 7057-7077. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10557-5
Ministry, J. P. (2021, December 9). Jordan – National Legislation . Retrieved from UN Environment Program. LEAP: https://leap.unep.org/countries/jo/national-legislation/announcement-enforcement-jordan-national-defence-law-no13-1992
Mohammadi, H. (2015). Investigating users’ perspectives on e-learning: An integration of TAM and IS success model. Computers in Human Behavior, 45, 359-374. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.07.044
Natasia, S. R., Wiranti, Y. T., & Parastika, A. (2022). Acceptance analysis of NUADU as e-learning platform using the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) approach. Procedia Computer Science, 197, 512-520. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2021.12.168
Pallant, J. (2020). SPSS survival manual. Routledge.
Pituch , K. A., & Lee, Y.-k. (2006). The influence of system characteristics on e-learning use. Computers & Education, 47(2), 222-244. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2004.10.007
Salloum , S., Alhamad, A. Q., Al-Emran, M., Abdel Monem, A., & Shaalan, K. (2019). Exploring students’ acceptance of e-learning through the development of a comprehensive technology acceptance model. IEEE Access, 7, 128445-128462. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2939467
Shadiev, R., & Yang, M. (2020). Review of studies on technology-enhanced. Sustainability, 12(2), 524. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/su12020524
Teo, T., Wong, S. L., & Chai, C. S. (2008). A cross-cultural examination of the intention to use technology between Singaporean and Malaysian pre-service teachers: An application of the technology acceptance model (TAM). Educational Technology & Society, 11(4), 265-280.
Wimpenny, K., Adefila, A., & DeWinter, A. (2018). Needs Analysis Report. Retrieved from JOVITAL – Jordan Opportunity for Virtual Innovative Teaching and Learning: https://jovital.eu/needs-analysis-report/. http://dx.doi.org/10.18552/jovital/2018/001