Arab World English Journal (AWEJ) Special Issue on Communication and Language in Virtual Spaces, January 2023     Pp177-188 

Full Paper PDF

Copyright Breach: Notions, Aspects, and Keys

Civil Engineering Department, Faculty of Technology
University of Abou Bekr Belkaid, Tlemcen, Algeria


Received:10/18/2022         Accepted:01/04/2023                 Published: 01/20/2023


This paper aims to re-examine the scientific notions linked to plagiarism, its aspects and origins, its occurrence in society, and ways of ascertaining it to enhance the alertness and consciousness of teachers and learners of plagiarism. The objective of information yielding is the detection and finding of data and strengthening the individual conditions. By itself, plagiarism and employing different evil ways are not well-matched with this objective and purpose. A good number of scholarly researchers consent that plagiarism is a grave breach of issuing moral principles. In the latest decennaries, the knowledge-based body is truly worried about the rapid increase of plagiarism. Despite being prevalent, plagiarism is not coherent with the values and ethics of knowledge. Currently, certain mass media announce alarming reports of plagiarism within research-based issuings, comprising information usage by renowned researchers. The occurrence scale of plagiarism has been divulged in diverse inquiries and grows dissimilar in different spheres, nations, instructive extents, and eras. Effective prevention by employing appropriate directives at a convenient time, the proper communications between instructors and learners, and working out practical strategies, for this purpose, are attainable methods of undertaking plagiarism.
Keywords: Aspects, copyright breach, keys, notions, plagiarism

Cite as: HAMIMED, N. (2023). Copyright Breach: Notions, Aspects, and Keys.  Arab World English Journal (AWEJ) Special Issue on Communication and Language in Virtual Spaces, January 2023:177-188.


Ashworth, P. and Bannister, P.,&Thorne, P.(1998).”Guilty in whose eyes?” University students perceptions of cheating and plagiarism in academic work and assessment. Journal of Studies in Higher Education, 22(2), 221-233.

Auer N. J.,&Krupar E. M. (2001). Mouse click plagiarism: The role of technology in plagiarism and the librarian’s role in combating it. LibraryTrends, 49 (3), 415-432.

Blum, S. D. (2009). My Word! Plagiarism and Academic College Culture. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

Blum, S. D. (2016). What it means to be a student today. In T. Bretag (Ed.), Handbook of academic integrity. (pp.1055-1073). Singapore: Springer.

Dellavalle, R., Banks, M. A.,&Ellis J.I. (2007). Frequently asked questions regarding self-plagiarism: How to avoid recycling fraud. Journal of J Am AcadDermatol, 57(3), 527.Doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2007.05.018

DeVossD.,& Rosati A. (2002). ‘‘It wasn’t me, was it?’’ The journal of Plagiarism and the Web. Computers and Composition, 19, 191-203.

Fialkoff, F. (1993). There’s no excuse for plagiarism. Library Journal, 28(5), 471-488.

Flint, A., Clegg. S.,&Macdonald, R. (2006). Exploring Staff Perceptions of Student Plagiarism. Journal of Further and Higher Education,30(2), 145-156.

Grover, D. (2003). Plagiarism and the internet: the use of correlation techniques to detect plagiarism. Journal of Computer Law and Security Report, 19(10), 6-8.

Hart, M.,&Friesner, T. (2004).Plagiarism and poor academic practice–a threat to the extension of e-learning in higher education? Electronic Journal on learning, 2(1), 89-96.

Hayes, N.,&Introna L. (2005).Cultural values, plagiarism, and fairness: When plagiarism gets in the way of learning. The Journal of Ethics & Behavior, 15(3), 213-231.

Howard, R. M. (2016). Plagiarism in Higher Education: An Academic Literacies Issue? – Introduction. In T. Bretag (Ed.), Handbook of Academic Integrity (pp. 499-501). Springer Singapore.

Macdonald, R. (2000). Why don’t we turn the tide of plagiarism to the learners’ advantage? Times Higher Educational Supplement,

Martin, D. F. (2005). Plagiarism and technology: A tool for coping with plagiarism.The Journal of Education for Business, 80(3), 149-152.

Maurer, H., Kappe, F.,&Zaka, B. (2006).Plagiarism-a survey.Journal of Universal Computer Science,12(8), 1050-1084. DOI: 10.3217/jucs-012-08-1050

Pakjou, A., Izadi, M., Masoudipour Sh.,&Fazel M. (2011).The pattern of travel medicine ethics in international cooperation programs. Journal of Military Medicine.13 (2), 117-123

Park, C. (2003). In other (people›s) words: Plagiarism by university students in literature and lessons. Journal of Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 28 (5), 471-488.

Roberts M. D.,&Toombs, R. (1993). A scale to assess perceptions of cheating in examination-related situations. Journal of Educational and Psychological Measurement,53, 755-62.

Roig, M. (2011). Plagiarism and paraphrasing criteria of college and university professors. Journal of Ethics&Behavior, 4(3), 307-323.

Stebelman, S. (1998). Cyber cheating: Dishonesty goes digital. Journal of American Libraries,29(8), 48-50.

Silverman, G., (2002). It’s a bird, a plane, and it’s Plagiarism, Buster! Newsweek, 40 (3), 12.

Vessal, K.,&Habibzadeh F. (2007). Rules of the game of scientific writing: fair play and plagiarism. The journal of The Lancet, 369(9562), 641-576. DOI:10.1016/S0140-6736(07)60307-9.

Received: 10/18/2022
Accepted: 01/04/2023 
Published: 01/20/2023 

Dr. Nadia HAMIMED is a lecturer at the Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Technology, Tlemcen University. She holds a Ph.D. in Comparative Literature. She has more than two publications in international peer-reviewed journals and wrote in two international books. She participated in more than six global communications and twelve national conferences. Her research fields are didactics, women’s writing, culture, and comparative literature. 0000-0002-6379-8 465