Arab World English Journal (AWEJ) Volume 13. Number2.  June 2022                                      Pp.386 -400
DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.24093/awej/vol13no2.26

Full Paper PDF

 

Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL) in ELT as a Link between Language
Learning and Content Development
 

  Syed Sarwar Hussain
Department of English Language and Translation
College of Languages and Translation
King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia

 

 Received:1/17/2022                     Accepted:6/3/2022              Published: 6/26/2022

 

 Abstract:
Content and Language Integrated Learning signifies studying a core subject (Mathematics, Physics, Chemistry, Engineering and so on) while simultaneously studying a language. It means integrating the two, with each serving the purpose of the other. Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL) is increasingly being used worldwide as it centers not only on content but on content and language both at the same time. There is no language without content and there is no content without language. This quantitative study discusses the use of CLIL in English language teaching (ELT). It dissects how teachers’ training and experience affect content development. A t-test analysis was conducted to analyze the effect of teachers’ training and teaching experiences on the use and impact of Content and Language Integrated Learning. The t-test analysis carried out for this study revealed that there was no significant relationship between teachers’ training programme and the use of CLIL (P<0.05),  and teacher’s experience and the impact of CLIL (P<0.05). But the results achieved in this study invariably show that a majority of teachers have found that on-the-job, in-service CLIL teachers training program had hugely and positively affected their teaching performance and the language accomplishments of their English language students.  And this was the central goal or purpose for which the present study was conducted.  Therefore, this study recommends on-the-job, in-service CLIL training for teachers which will ensure that they remain in touch with the global trends of CLIL in ELT.
Keywords: audio-lingual approach, communicative language teaching, Content and language integrated learning,
English language teaching, grammar-translation method, task-based language teachingr

Cite as: Hussain, S. S. (2022). Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL) in ELT as a Link between Language Learning and Content Development. Arab World English Journal, 13 (2) 386-400.
DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.24093/awej/vol13no2.26

References

Akimenko, O. (2016). Teaching approaches: Theory and practice. NUGSE Research in Education, 1(2), 2-8. Retrieved from nugserie.nu.edu.kz.

Awang, Mohd. G., & Sinnadurai, S. K. (2011). A Study on the Development of Strategic Tools in Study Orientation Skills towards Achieving Academic Excellence. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.4304/jltr.2.1.60-67.

Banegas, D. L. (2012). CLIL teacher development: Challenges and experiences. Latin American Journal of Content and Language Integrated Learning, 5(1), 46–56. https://doi.org/10.5294/laclil.2012.5.1.4.

Burt, M., Peyton, J. K., & Schaetzel, K. (2008). Working with adult English language learners with limited literacy: Research, practice, and professional development. Washington, DC: Center for Applied Linguistics. Resource URL, http://www.cal.org/caelanetwork/resources/limitedliteracy.html.

Çakır, H., & Cengiz, Ö. (2016). The use of open endedversus closed ended questions in Turkishclassrooms. Open Journal of Modern Linguistics, 6, 60-70 doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/ojml.2016.62006.

Celaya, M. L., Torras, M. R., & Pérez-Vidal, C. (2001). Short and mid-term effects of an earlier start. EUROSLA Yearbook, 1, 195–209. https://doi.org/10.1075/eurosla.1.15cel.

Coyle, D. (2007) Content and Language Integrated Learning: Towards a Connected Research Agenda for CLIL Pedagogies, International Journal of Bilingual Educationand Bilingualism, 10:5, 543-562. http://dx.doi.org/10.2167/beb459.0.

Coyle, D. (1999). Theory and Planning for Effective Classrooms: SupportingStudents in Content and Language Integrated Learning Contexts. In J. Masih (Ed.), Learning Through a Foreign Language (pp. 42-62). London, England:Centre for Information on Language Teaching and Research.

Coyle, D. (2007) Content and Language Integrated Learning: Towards aConnected Research Agenda for CLIL Pedagogies, International Journal of Bilingual Educationand Bilingualism, 10:5, 543-562. http://dx.doi.org/10.2167/beb459.0

Coyle, D. Hood, P., & Marsh, D. (2013). CLIL : content and language integrated learning. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Dendrinos, B. (1992). The EFL Textbook and Ideology. Athens : N.C. Grivas Publications.

Dueñas Vinuesa, M. (2002). Diane Larsen-Freeman. 2000. Techniques and Principles in Language Teaching. Second Edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 189 pp. Journal of English Studies, 3, 277. https://doi.org/10.18172/jes.83.

European Union. (1995). White Paper on Education and Training – Teaching and Learning – Towards the Learning Society. COM (95) 590 final, 29 November 1995. [EU Commission – COM Document]. Retrieved from, http://hdl.voced.edu.au/10707/95072.

Galluzzo, G. (1987). Book Reviews : Models of Teaching Revisited Models of Teaching, 3rd Edition Bruce R. Joyce and Marsha Weil Prentice-Hall Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, 1986. Journal of Teacher Education, 38(6), 57–59. https://doi.org/10.1177/002248718703800611.

Gilakjani, A. P., & Ahmadi, S. M. (2011). Role of Consciousness in Second Language Acquisition. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 1(5). https://doi.org/10.4304/tpls.1.5.435-442.

Hillyard, S. (2011). First steps in CLIL: Training the teachers. Latin American Journal of Content and Language Integrated Learning, 4(2), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.5294/laclil.2011.4.2.1

Kassem, H. M. (2018). The Impact of Student-Centered Instruction on EFL Learners’ Affect and Achievement. English Language Teaching, 12(1), 134. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v12n1p134.

Klimova, B. F. (2012). CLIL and the Teaching of Foreign Languages. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 47, 572–576. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.06.698.

Lyster, R. (2017). Content-Based Language Teaching. London: Routledge

Mart, C. T. (2013). The Audio-Lingual Method: An Easy way of Achieving Speech. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 3(12). https://doi.org/10.6007/ijarbss/v3-i12/412.

McDougald, J. S., & Pissarello, D. (2020). Content and Language Integrated Learning: In-Service Teachers’ Knowledge and Perceptions Before and After a Professional Development Program. Íkala, 25(2), 353–372. https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.ikala.v25n02a03

Mehishto, P., Marsh, D., & Frigols, M. J. (2008). Uncovering CLIL: Content and Language Integrated Learning in Bilingual and Multilingual Education. Macmillan Books for Teachers. Oxford:Macmillan Publishers Ltd.

Oluwatimilehin, J., & Owoyele, J. (2012). Study habits and academic achievement in core subjects among junior secondary school students in ondo state, nigeria. Bulgarian Journal of Science and Education Policy (BJSEP), 6(1):155-169.

Ozfidan, B., & Burlbaw, L. M. (2019). A Literature-Based Approach on Age Factors in Second Language Acquisition: Children, Adolescents, and Adults. International Education Studies, 12(10), 27. https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v12n10p27.

Pilar, D., & Garcia, L. (2003). Age and the acquisition of English as a foreign language. Clevedon ; Buffalo: Multilingual Matters.

Rabow, J., Charness, M. A. & Radcliffe-Vasile, F. (2000). William Fawcett Hill’s Learning through Discussion. Third Edition. Illinois: Waveland Press Inc.

Rao, P. S. (2019). The impact of teacher training in english language teaching on the learners’ learning. Journal of English Language and Literature, 6(4):68-79; doi:10.33329/joell.64.19.68.

Richards, J. C., & Rodgers, T. S. (2014). Approaches and methods in language teaching. Third Edition. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Sajjad, S. (2010). Effective teaching methods at higher education level. Pakistan journal of special education, 11, 29-43. Retrieved. February from, http://class.web.nthu.edu.tw/ezfiles/669/1669/img/1381/1.Effectiveteachingmethods athighereducationlevel.pdf.

Serrano, R., & Mu ̃noz, C. (2007). Same hours, different time distribution: Any difference in EFL? System, 35(3), 305–321. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2007.02.001.

Tsvetkova, M. (2016). The cognitive approach as a challenge in foreign language teaching. Studies in Linguistics, Culture, and FLT, 1, 125–135. https://doi.org/10.46687/silc.2016.v01.012

Yaman, İ. (2019). An Overview of the Key Figures in ELT. Karabük Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 9(2), 741-760.

Zhang, D. (2008). The Effect of Teacher Education Level, Teaching Experience, And Teaching Behaviors On Student Science Achievement. All Graduate Theses and Dissertations. 155.https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/etd/155. DOI:https://doi.org/10.26076/95c7-3d83.

 

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Tumblr
Reddit
Email
StumbleUpon
Digg
Received: 1/17/2022  
Accepted: 6/3/2022 
Published: 6/26/2022
https://dx.doi.org/10.24093/awej/vol13no2.26   

Syed Sarwar Hussain is Associate Professor at the Department of English Language & Translation, College of Languages and Translation, King Saud University, Riyadh. He has been teaching English for the past forty-two years, and has published several research papers in various international journals. He has authored eight books that include books on literary criticism and translations of Urdu short stories and novels.  ORCid ID  http://orcid.org /0000-0001-9973-5477