Arab World English Journal (AWEJ) Special Issue on Communication and Language in Virtual Spaces, January 2023              Pp.215-225
DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.24093/awej/comm1.17

Full Paper PDF

Changing Nature of English Tourism Discourse: A Linguistic Approach 

Natalia Koval
Department of the English Language and Translation
Drohobych Ivan Franko State Pedagogical University, Drohobych, Ukraine.
Correspondence Author: kovalnata17@ukr.net

Beata Kushka
Department of Foreign Languages
National University “Lviv Polytechnic”, Lviv, Ukraine.

Olena Nagachevska
Department of Foreign Languages
National University “Lviv Polytechnic”, Lviv, Ukraine.

Valeriia Smaglii
Philology Department, Odesa National Maritime University, Odesa, Ukraine

Lesya Uhryn
Department of Information Systems and Technologies of the Educational and Research Institute of
Business and Innovative Technologies
National University “Lviv Polytechnic”, Lviv, Ukraine

 

Received:07/21/2022             Accepted:01/2/2023                       Published:   01/20/2023

 

Abstract

In the modern world, the tourism business is becoming more and more popular and is developing at a tremendous speed. Different changes connected with the spreading of pandemic viruses, global and geopolitical changes influences all spheres of life, and tourism is not an exception. Such sciences as sociology, economics, psychology, and linguistics are trying to research the results of such changes. The study aims to explore the reasons of  changing nature of English tourism discourse and their consequences which can be viewed at lexical, grammatical and stylistic levels. The relevance of this topic is due to the fact that, despite the presence of a large number of works devoted to the study of tourism discourse, the issue of its typological status has not been resolved.  The methodology of the research is represented by a complex approach to the analysis of linguistic facts, which implies the mandatory consideration of any phenomenon in close relationship and interdependence with all elements included in the unified system of the text. In this work, the following methods of analysis of English tourism discourse include descriptive method (observation, interpretation and generalization), analysis and comparison of dictionary definitions, method of contextual analysis. The research findings of the study show the linguo-stylistic features of different genres of tourism discourse in changing conditions.
Keywords: changes, English tourism discourse, globalization, linguo-stylistic features, the geopolitical situation,

Cite as: Koval, N., Kushka,B., Nagachevska, O., Smaglii, V.,& Uhryn, L. (2023). Changing Nature of English Tourism Discourse: A Linguistic Approach Arab World English Journal (AWEJ) Special Issue on Communication and Language in Virtual Spaces, January 2023: 215-225
DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.24093/awej/comm1.17

References

Arutyunova, N. (1985). Istoki, problemy I kategorii pragmatiki [Problems and Categories of Pragmatics]. Novoe v zarubezhnoi lingvistike. Lingvisticheskaya pragmatika. Moscow: Progress.

Collins, V. R. (2008). The Tourism Society’s dictionary for the tourism industry (3rd ed.). CABI.

Crystal, D. (2012). English as a Global Language. Cambridge University press.

Dijk, T. A., & van, Kintsch, W. (1983). Strategies of Discourse Comprehension. New York: Academic Press.

Jacob, M., & Strutt, P. (2007). English for International Tourism. England : Pearson Education Limited.

Mansor, I., & Salman, G. (2016). Arabic for Tourism: Guidelines for Linguists and Translators. Arab World English Journal, 7(3). DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.24093/awej/vol7no3.6

Thomas, J. (1996). Meaning in Interaction : An Introduction to Pragmatics.    London: Longman.

Hinch, T., & Higham, J. (2011). Sport Tourism Development (2nd ed.). Channel View Publications. Limited.

Ungerer, F. (2007). Word-formation. The Oxford Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Werth, P. (1999). Text Worlds: Representing Conceptual Space in Discourse. New York: Longman.

Wierzbicka, A. (1996). Semantics: Primes and Universals. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Tumblr
Reddit
Email
StumbleUpon
Digg
Received: 07/21/2022
Accepted: 01/2/2023 
Published: 01/20/2023
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2191-3135
https://dx.doi.org/10.24093/awej/comm1.17 

Natalia Koval, Ph.D. in Philology, Associate Assistant Professor of Drohobych Ivan Franko State Pedagogical University, Drohobych, Ukraine. Interested in: pragmalinguistics, psycholinguistics, discourse analysis, scientific and professional communication. https:// orcid.org/0000-0003-2191-3135

 Beata Kushka, Ph.D. in Philology, Associate Assistant Professor of the National University “Lviv Polytechnic”, Lviv, Ukraine.Interested in: translation studies, teaching foreign languages for special purposes, foreign literature studies, scientific and professional communication. https:// orcid.org/0000-0002-4080-4607

 Olena Nagachevska, Ph.D. in Philology, Associate Assistant Professor of the National University “Lviv Polytechnic”,  Lviv, Ukraine. Interested in: translation studies, teaching foreign languages for special purposes, foreign literature studies, scientific and professional communication, cross-cultural communication.https://orcid. org/ 0000-0002-5200-8085

 Valeriia Smaglii, Doctor of Philology, Associate Professor of Odesa National Maritime University. The field of her interests include Phonetics and Phonology, Intercultural Communication, Pragmatics. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6222-7652

Lesya Uhryn, Senior lecturer of the National University “Lviv Polytechnic”, Lviv, Ukraine
Interested in mathematical methods and models, information technologies.
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6137-313X