Arab World English Journal (AWEJ) Special Issue on the English Language in Ukrainian Context, November 2020 Pp.321- 329
Binary Opposition “Man-Machinery” in R. Bradbury Science Fiction Works: A Cognitive
Korunets Department of English and German Philology and Translation
Kyiv National Linguistic University, Kyiv, Ukraine
Department of Foreign Languages, Kyiv National Linguistic University, Kyiv, Ukraine
Korunets Department of English and German Philology and Translation,
Kyiv National Linguistic University, Kyiv, Ukraine
This paper focuses on cognitive-linguistic features of the binary opposition “man-machinery” in the science fiction works by R. Bradbury. The article aims to determine the means of the verbal representation of “man-machinery” and build frame models of its components in Bradbury’s science fiction writings. The study contributes to the stylistic and linguo-poetic analysis of binary oppositions in fiction texts, idiostylistics and genre theory. The study relies upon linguistic, stylistic, and discursive analyses as well as cognitive linguistic analysis to ensure the reliability and validity of the obtained results. Furthermore, four-stage algorithm methodology used in this research allowed the author to define a general literary context of the analyzed works, select the research material, analyze the identified means of binary opposition “man-machinery,” and model frames of its components. The obtained results reveal that the linguistic embodiment of the components of the binary opposition “man-machinery” is based on the use of the lexical – direct and figurative, stylistic, and discursive means of nomination. The study reconstructs the concepts – the constituents of the megaconcepts man and machinery and on the basis of anthropocentric perception compares their conceptual domains, namely as physical, psychological, mental, and social phenomena. The research reveals conceptual binary opposition man-machinery as a tool for constructing a science fiction model of the world in Bradbury’s texts within three parameters: space-time coordinates, cause and effect relationships, and valorative indicators. The introduced methodology of binary opposition analysis is perspective within the scope of science fiction, fiction texts and films.
Keywords: binary opposition, cause and effect relationships, conceptual binary opposition man-machinery, frame modeling, science fiction model of the world, space-time coordinates, verbalization means of binary opposition components, valorative indicators
Cite as: Podsievak, K., Sieriakova, I., & Franko, O. (2020). Binary Opposition “Man-Machinery” in R. Bradbury Science Fiction Works: A Cognitive Linguistic Approach. Arab World English Journal: Special Issue on English in Ukrainian Context. 321- 329.
Akhmad I., & Chmel V. (2015). Association as Linguistic Phenomenon. URL: http://www.kamts1.kpi.ua/sites/default/files/files/ahmad%20chmel_association.pdf
Alefirenko, N. F.(2013). Consistency of Media Lexical and Semantic Space. URL: https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/151225553.pdf
Antonova, M. B. (2016). On Role of Conceptual Oppositions in Forming Lexical and Semantic Categories of English Adjective Names, Vestnik of Bryansk State University, 2, 144–149.
Arnold, I. V. (2002). Stylistics. Modern English Language. Moscow: Flinta: Nauka.
Barthes, R. (1975). Basis of Semiology. Structuralism: For and Against. Moscow: Progress.
Baudrillard, J. (2000). Temptation. Moscow: Ad Marginem.
Bradbury, R. (1953a). Fahrenheit 451. URL: https://www.secret-satire-society.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/Ray-Bradbury-Fahrenheit-451.pdf
Bradbury, R. D. (1951). The Illustrated Man. URL: https://csuclc.files.wordpress.com/2013/03/illustrated-man-by-ray-bradbury.pdf
Bradbury, R. D. (1953b). The Murderer. URL: http://www.sediment.uni-goettingen.de/staff/dunkl/zips/The-Murderer.pdf
Bradbury, R. D. (1950). The Veldt. The Saturday Evening Post. URL: https://repositorio.ufsc.br/bitstream/handle/123456789/163728/The%20Veldt%20-%20Ray%20Bradbury.pdf?sequence=1
Deese, J. (1965). The Structure of Associations in Language and Thought. Baltimore : Johns Hopkins Press.
Denisova, S. P. (1996). Typology of the Categories of Lexical Semantics. Kyiv
Dubchak, O.P. (2011). Conceptual Opposition ‘svii’-‘chuzhyi’ as Basic Regulatory Fragment of Ukrainian Language Outview. Naukovyi Chasopys Dragomanov NPU,5, 92–99.
Fass, D. (1997). Processing Metonymy and Metaphor. London : Simon Fraser University.
Krapivnik, E. V. (2010). Systemic Oppositions in Russian Language (Based on Adjectival Color Naominations). Uchenyie zametki TOSU, 1 (2), 66-70.
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (2003). Metaphors We Live By. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Malinovich, Yu. M. (2011). Functional Semantic Categories of Binary Opposition. Text Realization of Functional-Semantic Categories and Fields. Rostov-na-Donu: IPO PI YuFU, 50-68.
Maslova, V. A. (2011). Introduction in Cognitive Linguistics. Moscow: Flinta: Nauka.
Nikonova, V. G. (2008). Conceptual Space of Tragic in Shakespeare’s Plays: Poetic and Cognitive Analysis: Diss. DSc in Philology. Kyiv: Kyiv National Linguistic University.
Odintsov, V. V. (2004). Text Stylistics. Moscow: URSS.
Ostrenko, S. A. (2014). Binary Character of Innovative Activities in Education. Grani. Philosophiia, 2 (116), 41-46.
Ponomariova, E. Yu. (2008). Conceptual Opposition “LIFE-DEATH” in Poetic Discourse (Based on D. Thomas and V. Bryusov Poetry): Doctoral dissertation. Tumen: Tumen State University.
Prykhodchenko, O. O. (2017). Conceptualization of Opposition LIFE-DEATH in Gothic World Perception (Based on English Vampire Novels): Doctoral dissertation. Zaporizhzhua: Zaporizhzhia National University.
Prykhodko, A. N. (2013). Concepts and Concept Systems. Dnepropetrovsk: Belaia E. A.
Romashenkova, E. S. (2012). Opposition Concept “health/illness” as Object of Linguorhethorical Analysis in B. Pasternak Idiostyle (“Doctor Zhivago”). Scientific researches and their practical application. Modern state and ways of development, 2-12, 175–185.
Sakharova, O. V. (2007). Binary Opposition Concepts in Ukrainian Language Perception. URL: http://dspace.nbuv.gov.ua/bitstream/handle/123456789/55121/62-Sakharova.pdf?sequence=1
Semegyn, T. S. (2011). Dynamics of Semantic Structure of Binary Concepts beautiful/ugly in the English and Ukrainian Languages: Doctoral dissertation. Kyiv: Dragomanova NPU.
Sysoiev, V. A. (2010). Binary Oppositions in Language and Speech. Sbornik Materialov Nauchnoy Konferentsii “Ekologiia Yazyka na Perekrestke Nauk”. 266-271.
Tetior, A. N. (2016). Philosophy of Multiple World. Moscow.
Trubetzkoy, N. (1969). Principles of Phonology. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Khayrutdinova, A. R. (2012). Binary Oppositions as Means of Conceptualization of the World Perception by A. A. Kim (Based on “Onliriya”, “Blistets”, “Poselok Kentavrov”): Doctoral dissertation. Kazan: Kazan Federal University.
Truszczynska, A. (2002/2003). Conceptual Metonymy – the Problem of Boundaries in the Light of ICMs. Poznan Studies in Contemporary Linguistics, 38, 221–237.
Willners, С. (2001). Antonyms in Context. Lund: Lunds universitet.