Arab World English Journal ( August 2020)                                      Theses ID 257                               Pp. 1- 187
DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.24093/awej/th.257

Full Theses PDF 

 

 

Application of Teachers’ Knowledge of Socratic Questioning in Developing EFL Critical Thinking
Skills among Omani Post-Basic Learners

 

Moosa Ahmed Hassan Bait Ali Sulaiman
Department of Education
Dhofar University, Salalah, Sultanate of Oman

 

Author: Moosa Ahmed Hassan Bait Ali Sulaiman
Thesis Title: Application of Teachers’ Knowledge of Socratic Questioning in Developing EFL Critical Thinking Skills among Omani Post-Basic Learners
Institution: 
University Malaysia Sabah, Faculty Psychology and Education, Malaysia
Major: Education
Degree: Ph.D.
Year of award:
  September, 2019
Supervisor: 
Assoc. Prof. Dr. Suyansah Swanto &  Assoc. Prof. Dr. Wardatul Akmam Din
KeyWords: Socratic questioning, students’ critical thinking, teachers’ knowledge, Oman

 

Abstract:
With the premise that effective use of Socratic Questioning in instructional practices is of vital importance in EFL/ESL classrooms, this study was undertaken to investigate application of Omani EFL teachers’ knowledge of Socratic Questioning (SQ) on Students’ Critical thinking (CT) in post basic schools. This study is conducted in two phases of investigation. Phase I examined the correlation between teachers’ knowledge and actual use of SQ. Phase II study investigated the application of Omani EFL teachers’ knowledge of SQ on students’ CT in post-basic schools. The present study made an attempt to (a) Determine the relationship between teachers’ knowledge of SQ and their actual use of SQ. (b) Ascertain whether there is any statistically significant difference between mean scores of those who are taught through SQ and those who are taught CT skills in a normal setting. (c) Identify CT strategies, the students were able to develop and apply at the end of the intervention phase. A total of 230 EFL teachers, which comprises a 100% of the total population of all EFL post-basic female teachers in Dhofar region of Oman, participated in this study. The multi-method procedures and data analyses showed that (a) There is a strong positive relationship between teachers’ perceived knowledge and their actual use of SQ; (b) There are significant differences between mean scores of those who were taught CT through SQ and those who were taught CT skills in a normal setting; (c) There is a clear evidence to suggest that students in the experimental group were able to develop effective CT strategies during the intervention phase. The findings of this study offer a number of implications: (a) For instructional practice that involves the teachers and students; (b) For policy and decision makers; and (c) For syllabus designers and testing and evaluation. In addition, it identifies and proposes certain areas related to pedagogy for future research.

Cite as:  Sulaiman, M.A.H.B.A. (2019). Application of Teachers’ Knowledge of Socratic Questioning in Developing EFL Critical Thinking Skills among Omani Post-Basic Learners. University Malaysia Sabah, Faculty Psychology and Education. Malaysia. (Ph.D.Thesis). Retrieved from Arab World English Journal (ID Number: 257 August 2020, 1- 187.
DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.24093/awej/th.257

References

[1] Alder, J. 1982. The paidea proposal. New York: Macmillan.

[2] Al-Kindi, N. S. and Al-Mekhlafi, A. M. 2017. The practice and challenges of implementing critical thinking skills in post-basic EFL classrooms. English Language Teaching, 10 (12):116-133.

[3] Al-Mahrooqi, R. 2012. English communication skills: How are they taught in schools and universities in Oman. English Language Teaching, 5(4):125-130. Doi.10.5539/elt. v5n4p124.

[4] Angelo, T. & Cross, K. 1993. Classroom assessment techniques: A handbook for college teachers. USA: Jossey-Bass, Inc.

[5] Austin, J. 1962. How to do things with words. MA: Harward University Press.

[6] Backett, G. & Slater, T. 2005. The project framework: A tool or language content and skills integration. ELT Journal, 59 (2):108-116.

[7] Baxter-Magolda, B. 2008. Three elements of self-authorship. Journal of College Students Development, 49(4):0897-5264.

[8] Beanmont, J. 2010. A sequence of critical thinking tasks. TESOL Journal, 1 (4):427-448.

[9] Beck, I. L. & McKeown, M. G. 2002. Text talk: Capturing the benefits of read aloud experiences for young children. The Reading Teacher, 55:10-20.

[10] Bezemer, J., & Mavers, D. (2011). Multimodal transcription as academic practice: A social semiotic perspective. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 14(3):191–206.

[11] Bigelow, M. & Ranney, S. 2005. Pre-service teachers’ knowledge about language and its transfer to lesson planning. In N. Bartles (Ed.). Applied linguistics and language teacher education (pp. 179-200). New York: Springer.

[12] Bloom, B., Engelehart, M., Furst, E., WILL, W. & Karthwhol, D. (Eds). 1956. Taxonomy of Educational Objectives, Handbook 1: Cognitive Domain. New York: David McKey.

[13] Carl, H. 2010. Cognitive education: A transactional metacognitive perspective. Journal of Cognitive Education and Psychology, 9(1):21-35.

[14] Cate, K. 2002. Teaching for better world: Global issues and language education. Human Rights Education in Asian Schools. Asia-Pacific Human Rights Information Center, Osaka 5:1-17.

[15] Chang, Y. 2010. Students’ perceptions of teaching styles and use of learning strategies. Master of Science Dissertation, University of Tennessee.

[16] Chaudron, C. 1988. Second language classrooms: Research on teaching and learning. London: Cambridge University Press.

[17] Chenault, T. & Orsel, E. 2008. An act of translation: The need to understand students’ understanding of critical thinking in the undergraduate classroom. The Journal of Effective Teaching,8 (2):5-20.

[18] Cheng, M. M. H., Cheng, A. Y. N., & Tang, S. Y. F. 2010. Closing the gap between the theory and practice of teaching: Implications for teacher education programs in Hong Kong. Journal of Education for Teaching, 36 (1):91-104.

[19] Chin, C. 2006. Using self-questioning to promote pupils’ process skills thinking. School Science Review, (321):113-123.

[20] Dagli, M. 2008. Integrating critical thinking skills into planning and implementation of teaching Turkish: A comparative case study of three teachers. A PhD Thesis: Middle East Technical University.

[21] Egege, S. & Kutieleh, S. 2004. Critical thinking: Teaching foreign notions to foreign students. International Educational Journal, 4 (4):75-85.

[22] Eggen, P. & Kauchak, D. 2002. Strategies for teachers: Teaching content and thinking skills (4th Ed.). Needham Heights: M.A. Allyn and Bacon.

[23] Elder, L. & Paul, R. 2009. Critical thinking development: A stage theory. Retrieved on 15 October 2018 from www.criticalthinking.org

[14] Elliot, A. 2006. Hierarchical model of approach-avoidance motivation. Kluwer Academic Publishers, 30 (2):111-116.

[25] Ennis, R. & Weir, E. 1985. The Ennis-Weir Critical Thinking Test. CA: Midwest, Pacific Grove.

[26] Ennis, R. H. 2008. Nationwide testing of critical thinking for higher education: Vigilance required. Teaching Philosophy, 31(1):1-26. Siegel, H. & Biro, J. 2008. Rationality, reasonableness, and critical rationalism: Problems with the pragma-dialectical view. Argumentation, 22(2):191-202.

[27] Facion, P. 2007. Critical thinking: What is and Why it counts? California Academic Press, 1-20.

[28] Folsom, C. 2009. Teaching for intellectual and emotional learning (TIEL): Bringing thinking and moral-ethical learning into classrooms. In D. Ambrose & T.  Cross (Eds.). Morality, ethics and gifted minds (pp. 1 – 16). New York: Springer Publishing Company.

[29] Forsyth, D. R., Paul, S., Kelley, K., & McMillan, J. H. 2009. What causes failure and success? Students’ perceptions of their academic outcomes. Social Psychology of Education, 12 (2):157-174.

[30] Gambrill, E. 2005. Critical Thinking in Critical Practice: Improving the Quality of Judgment and Decisions. New Jersy: Wiley & Sons Press.

[31] Garret, W. 2006. Developing Sixth Grade Gadflies: An Action research project presented to the Shawnee Mission Board of Education. Bluejaket-Flint Elementary.

[32] GianCarlo, C. 2004. Assessing secondary students’ dispositions towards critical thinking. Development of California Measurement, 64 (2):347-364.

[33] Goddard, A. and Mean, L. 2009. Language and Gender. Lobndon and New York:      Routledge.

[34] Goldberger, J. & Crow, J. 2010. Gender inequality within the U.S. land-grant agricultural sciences professoriate. International Journal of Gender, Science and Technology, 2(3), 23-34.

[35] Halpern, F. 2002. Teaching for critical thinking: Four-part model. In Davis, S., Buskist, W. (Eds.). The teaching of psychology (PP 160 – 182). New York: Psychology Press.

[36] Hammond, J. (2006). High challenge, high support: Integrating language and content instruction for diverse learners in an English literature classroom. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 5(4):269-283.

[37] House, J. and Kasper, G. 1981. Politeness markers in English and German. In F. Coulmus (Ed.) Conversational Routine, Vol. 2, The Hague (pp. 157-185). The Netherlands: Mouton Publishers.

[38] J. Doughty and Michael H. Long.  2005. The handbook of second language acquisition. California. Blackwell Publishing.

[39] Johnson, R., 2008. Making sense of “Informal Logic”. Informal Logic, 16 (29):1-30.

[40] Keng, L. 1996. Critical thinking and Socratic inquiry in the classroom. Australian Association for research in Education. Paper presented at the joint ERA, AARE Conference, Singapore, 1996.

[41] Keng, L. 1996. Critical thinking and Socratic inquiry in the classroom. Australian Association for research in Education. Paper presented at the joint ERA, AARE Conference, Singapore, 1996.

[42] Kite, E., Stockedale, D., Whitley, E. & Johnson, T. (2005). Attitudes toward younger and older adults: An updated meta-analytic review. Journal of Social Issues, 61(2):241-266.

[43] Krashen, S. D. 1985. Input in second language questions. Oxford, UK: Pergamon Press.

[44] Kuhn, D. 2005. Education for thinking, library of congress cataloging-in-publishing data, Harvard College language learners. The Modern Language Journal, 83, 193-201.

[45] Kumar, r., and James, R. 2015. Evaluation of critical thinking in higher education in Oman. International Journal of Higher Education, 4(3):33-43.

[46] Leighton, J. & Geiri, M. 2007. Defining and evaluating models of cognition used in educational measurement to make inferences about examinees’ teaching processes. Educational Measurement Journal, 26(2):3-16.

[47] Lipman, M. 2003. Thinking in education: Approaches in teaching for thinking. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

[48] Long, M. H. 1996. The role of the linguistic environment in second language              acquisition. In W. C. Ritchie & T. K. Bhatia Eds.) Handbook of research on language acquisition, 2:413-468. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.

[49] Long, M., & Sato, C. 1983. Classroom foreigner talk discourse: Forms and functions of teachers’ questions. In H. Seliger, & M. Long (Eds.). Classroom-oriented research in second language acquisition (pp. 268-286). Rowley, MA: Newsbury House

[50] Lotter, C., Harwood, W. & Bonner, J. 2007. The influence of core teaching conceptions on teachers’ use of inquiry teaching practice. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44(9):1318-1347.

[51] Luk, J. C. M., & Lin, A. M. Y. 2007. Classroom interactions as cross-cultural encounters: Native speakers in EFL lessons. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

[52] M. Lightbown, Nina Spada. 1999. How languages are learned. Oxford. Oxford University Press.

[53] Martin, R. 2010. Bells that Still Can Ring: Systems Thinking in Practice. In: 1st International Workshop on Complexity and Real World Application Using the Tools and Concepts from Complexity Science to Support Real World Decision-Making Activities, (pp. 21-23), July, England, UK.

[54] Marzano, R., Pickering, D. & Pollock, J. 2003. Classroom instruction that works: Research-based strategies for increasing students’ achievement. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data, USA.

[55] Masatoshi, S. & Susan, B. 2016. Peer Interaction and Second Language Learning.  John Benjamins, vii, 399 pp.

[56] McMillan. H. 1987. Enhancing college students’ critical thinking: Download PDF

[57] Mehta, S. R. & Al-Mahrooqi, R. 2014. Can thinking be taught? Linking critical thinking and writing in an EFL context. RELC Journal, 46 (1), 23-36.

[58] Bezemer, J., & Mavers, D. (2011). Multimodal transcription as academic practice: A social semiotic perspective. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 14(3):191–206.

[59] Mehta, S. R., Al-Mahrooqi, R., Denman, C. & Al-Aghbari, K. 2018. Assessing Omani university entrant’s critical thinking skills with the Cornell class reasoning test form X. Pertanika Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 26 (4), 2229-2242.

[60] Miri, B., David, P. & Uri, Z., 2007. Purposely teaching for the promotion of higher-order thinking skills: A case of critical thinking. Research in Science Education, 37(4):353-369, DOI: 10.1007/s11165-006-9029-2.

[61] Moor, L. & Rudd, R. 2002. Using Socratic questioning in the classroom. ProQuest Education Journals, 75(3):24.

[62] Muspratti, S., Luke, A. & Leonards, P. 2009. Constructing critical literacies: Teaching and learning textual practice. National Centre for Vocational Education Research (pp. 102-155). Hampton Press.

[63] Norris, S. & Ennis, R. 1989. Evaluating critical thinking. Pacific Crove, CA; Medwest Publications.

[64] Nunan, D. 2003. The Impact of English as A global language on educational policies and practice in Asia-Pacific Region. TESOL Quarterly, 37(4):589-613.

[65] Oakleaf, M. 2008. Dangers and opportunities: A conceptual map of information literacy assessment approaches. The Johns Hopkins University Press, 8(3): 233-253.

[66] Paul, R., & Elder, L. 2006. The art of Socratic questioning: The foundation for critical thinking. Retrieved on 25 March 2017 from www.criticalthinking.org

[67] Paul, R., Willsen, J., & Binker, A. J. A. 1993. Critical thinking: what every person needs to survive in a rapidly changing world. Revised third edition. Santa Rosa, CA: Foundation for Critical Thinking.

[68] Paul, S. 2010. A survey of attitudes towards critical thinking among Hong Kong secondary school teachers, Journal of Thinking Skills and Creativity. 6 (1):14-23.

[69] Pavlenko, A. and Lantoff, J. P. (2000). Second language learning as participation and the (re) construction of selves. In J. P. Lantoff (Ed.), Sociocultural theory and second language learning (pp. 155-177). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

[70] Perry, W. 1970. Forms of intellectual and ethical development in the college years: A scheme. New York: Holt, Rinehart.

[71] Preiss, D. & Sternberg, A. 2010. Innovation in teaching psychology: Perspectives on learning, teaching, and human development. New York: Springer Publishing Company.

[72] Qing, Z., Jing, G. & Yan, W. 2010. Promoting pre-service teachers’ critical thinking skills by inquiry-based chemical experiment. Innovation and Creativity in Education, 2(2):4597-4603.

[73] Redfield, D. L. & Rousseau, E. W. 1981. A meta-analysis of experimental research on teacher questioning behavior. Review of educational research, 51 (2), 237-245.

[74] Resnick, L., 2005. Principles of Learning for Effort-Based Education, version 3, 0. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.

[75] Sahamid, H. 2004. Socratic questioning in the teaching of short stories: An action research study. The Reading Matrix, 4(2):63-71.

[76] Schuh, K., 2004. Learner-Centered principles in teacher- centered practice. Teaching and Teacher Education, 20(8):833-846.

[77] Schwarz, B., Hershkewitz, R. & Azmon, S. 2006. The role of the teacher in turning claims to arguments. In J. Novotna, H. Moraova, M. Kvatka & N. Stehlikova (Eds). Proceedings 30th conference of the international group for the psychology of mathematics education, 5(pp. 65-72). Prague: PME.

[78] Scollon, R. & Scollon, S. W. 2010. Discourse and intercultural communication. In Deborah Schifffrin, Deborah Tannen & HeidiE. Hamilton (Eds.) The Handbook of Discourse Analysis (pp. 538-547). USA, UK, Australia: Blackwell Publishing.

[79] Searle, J. 1979. Expression and Meaning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

[80] Searle, J. R. 1969. Speech Acts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

[81] Sfard, A. 1998. On two metaphors for learning and the dangers of choosing just one. Educational Researcher, 27:4-13.

[82] Shomoossi, N. 2004. The effect of teachers’ questioning behavior on EFL classroom interaction: A classroom research study. The Reading Matrix, 4(2):1-9

[83] Shulman, L. 1986b. Those who understand: knowledge growth in teaching in Educational Researcher, 15(2):4-14.

[84] Singh, P., Thomas, L., Mueller, E., Lims, G., Perkins, T. & Zhu, W. 2010. Open mind common sense: Knowledge acquisition from the general public. Sprigerlink Library, 2519:1223-1237.

[85] Sternberg, J., Roediger, L. & Halpern, F. 2007. Critical thinking in psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

[86] Stevens, R. 1912. The questions as a means of efficiency in instruction: Acritical study of classroom practice. New York. Teachers College, Columbia University.

[87] Susana E. Franco-Fuenmayor, Yolanda N. Padrón & Hersh C. Waxman. 2015. Investigating Bilingual/ESL Teachers’ Knowledge and Professional Development Opportunities in a Large Suburban School District in Texas, Bilingual Research Journal, 38(3):336-352.

[88] Thakur, V. S. 2002. Sociolinguistic perspectives of politeness in communication. Delhi: Mohit Publications.

[89] Thayer-Bacon, B. J. 2000. Transforming critical thinking: Thinking constructively. NewYork: Teachers College Press.

[90] Theresa, E. 2007. Assessing and enhancing critical thinking skills: enhanced peer review (EPR) with CAT instrument. PhD Dissertation., Educational Cognitive Therapy, Tennessee Technological University.

[91] Tsui, L., (2002). Fostering critical thinking through effective pedagogy: Evidence from four institutional case studies. Journal of Higher Education, 37(3):1-8.

[92] Tuzlukova, V. and Prabhukanth, K. U. (2018). Critical thinking and problem solving skills: English for science foundation program students’ perspectives. Collection of Papers of the Faculty of Philosophy, XLVIII (3), 37-60. Retrieved fromfile:///C:/Users/moosa/Downloads/Critical thinking and problem solving skills Engli.pdf

[93] Van Lier, L. 1988. The classroom and the language learner. London. Longman

[94] Vygotsky, L. (1962). Thought and language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

[95] Walker, J., Brophy, S., Hodge, L. & Bransford, J. 2006. Establishing Experience to Develop a Wisdom of Professional Practice. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 49-53, doi: 1002/t/.255.

[96] Watson, G. & Glasser, E. 2006. Watson-Glasser critical thinking appraisal short form manual. San Antonio, TX: Harcourt.

[97] Watzke, J. 2007. Foreign language pedagogical knowledge: Toward a development theory of beginning teacher practice. The Modern, Language Journal, 91(1): 36-82.

[98] Weber, F. F. 1998. Three models of power in David Memet’s Oleanna. In Jonatnan Culpeper, Mick Short and Peter Verdonk (Eds). Exploring the Language of Drama: From Text to Context (pp. 112-127). London and New York: Routledge.

[99] Wegerif, R. (Eds.). 2007. Dialogic Education and Technology Expanding in Space of Learning. New York: Springer Science and Business Media LLC.

[100] Wenning, J. 2006. Engaging students in conducting Socratic dialogues: Suggestions for science teachers. Available on wenning@phy.ilstu.edu

[101] Weusijana, B. 2006. A Socratic ASK system: Helping educators provide a Socratic tutor for learners. A PhD Dissertation. Northwestern University, UMI No. 3238417.

[102] Whorf, B. L. 1956. Science and linguistics. In J. B. Carroll (Ed.) Language, Thought and Reality, MA: MIT Press.

[103] Wragg, E. and Brown, G. 2001. Questioning in primary schools. Routlege Falmmer, London.

[104] Yazdanpanah, L. 2015. Investigation of ESL teacher knowledge in Australian adult education. TESL-EJ, Lilly Monash University, Australia, 18(4):52-59.

[105] Zohar, A. 2004. Higher order thinking in science classroom, students’ learning and teachers’ professional development. Dordrech: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

[106] Zohar, A. 2007. Science teacher and professional development in argumentation, science and technology. Education Library, 35(3):245-268.

Share on facebook
Facebook
Share on twitter
Twitter
Share on linkedin
LinkedIn
Share on tumblr
Tumblr
Share on reddit
Reddit
Share on email
Email
Share on stumbleupon
StumbleUpon
Share on digg
Digg
https://dx.doi.org/10.24093/awej/th.257
Share on facebook
Share on twitter
Share on linkedin
Share on tumblr
Share on digg
Share on email
Share on reddit
Share on stumbleupon
Share on vk

Moosa Ahmed Hassan Bait Ali Sulaiman
Department of Education
Dhofar University, Salalah, Sultanate of Oman