Arab World English Journal (AWEJ) Volume 11. Number4 December 2020 Pp. 534 -546
An Evaluation of the Algerian EFL Baccalaureate Exam under the Cognitive
Domains of Bloom’s Taxonomy
Fatine Merieme BELARBI
Didactics and Assessment in English Language Education
Abou Bakr Belkaid University, English Department, FLPATP lab N°72, Tlemcen, Algeria
English for Specific Purpose
English Department, Abou Bakr Belkaid University
The Algerian English foreign language (EFL) baccalaureate is a high stake exam that assesses both students’ learning and their critical thinking skills. Thus, devising appropriate and effective exam questions may be a problematic issue for tests designers. Under the requirements of the current Algerian English curriculum, the exam questions must cover the lower and higher-order thinking skills of Bloom’s taxonomy. On this basis, this research paper seeks to investigate the effectiveness of the EFL baccalaureate exam papers, and aims to answer the research question: ‘To what extent does the Algerian EFL Baccalaureate exam paper cover the lower and higher-order thinking skills of Bloom’s taxonomy?’ This research is a descriptive content analysis; the researcher analyzed the exam questions of the Algerian EFL Baccalaureate under the cognitive domains of Bloom’s taxonomy. This study is significant as it helps tests’ designers to design practical EFL exams that develop students’ thinking skills and language competencies. The findings of this study revealed that the EFL baccalaureate exam does not establish the students’ higher-order thinking skills and does not assess their communicative abilities. Accordingly, some recommendations are suggested to hopefully help test designers to improve the quality of the EFL Baccalaureate questions.
Keywords: Algerian EFL baccalaureate exam, Bloom’s taxonomy, cognitive domains, practical exam
Cite as: BELARBI, F. M.,& BENSAFA, A. (2020). An Evaluation of the Algerian EFL Baccalaureate Exam under the Cognitive Domains of Bloom’s Taxonomy. Arab World English Journal, 11 (4) 534 -546.
3AS English Curriculum, 3. A. (june 2011). Algerian National Ministery of education.
Bloom, B. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives, handbook i: the cognitive domain. Longman (2nd ed).Longman. Addison Wesely Publishing Group.
Cohen, L., Manion, L. & Morrison, K. (2007). Research methods in education (5th Ed.). London and New York: Routledge Falmer.
Eber, P. A., & Parker, T. S. (2007). Assessing student learning: applying bloom’s taxonomy. Human service education, 27(1). 45-53.
Examiner Guide (2017). Algerian National Office for Examinations and Competitions.
EFL Baccalareate exam ( 2019). National Office for Examinations and Competitions
Gray D. P (1996). Handbook of Classroom Assessment: Learning, Achievement, and Adjustment. California. Academic Press.
Haris, S. S., & Omar, N. (2015). Bloom’s Taxonomy Question Categorizatıon Using Rules and N-gram Approach. Journal of Theoretical & Applied Information Technology, 76(3).
Jones, k. O., Harland, J., Reid, J., & Bartlett, R. (2009). Relationship between examination questions and bloom’s taxonomy. Proceedings of frontiers in education conference, 2009. Fie’09. 39th ieee. 1-6.
Kastberg, S. E. (2003). Using bloom’s taxonomy as a framework for classroom assessment. The mathematics teacher, 96(6), 402-405.
Koksal, D. ,& Ulum, Ö.G. (2018). Language assessment through Bloom’s Taxonomy. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 14(2), 76-88.
Newman, D. R. (1994). Evaluating the quality of learning in CSCL. Presented at UK CSCW SIG workshop on CSCL. Edinburgh: Heriott-Watt University.
Omar, N., Haris, S. S., Hassan, R., Arshad, H., Rahmat, M., Zainal, N. F. A., & Zulkifli, R. (2012). Automated analysis of exam questions according to Bloom’s taxonomy. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 59, 297-303.
Ordem, E. (2016). Developing Critical-Thinking Dispositions in a Listening/Speaking Class. English Language Teaching, 10(1), 50.
Scott, T. (2003). Bloom’s Taxonomy Applied to Testing in Computer Science Classes. Consortium for Computing Science in Colleges: Rocky Mountain Conference. 267-274.
The American Heritage Dictionary of the English Language. Retrieved march 20, 2016, from https://www.ahdictionary.com/word/search.html?q=cognition
Zoller, U. & Tsaparlis, G. (1997). Higher and lower-order cognitive skills: The case of chemistry. Research in Science Education, 27,117- 130.