Arab World English Journal (AWEJ) Volume 12. Number4 December 2021 Pp.302- 316
A Sociomaterial Perspective of the Challenges of Implementing the Communicative
Approach in Saudi State Schools
Rajaa Mahmoud Fallatah
Department of Curriculums and Instructions, College of Education
Umm Al-Qura University, Saudi Arabia
Received: 9/30/2021 Accepted:11/15/2021 Published:12/15/2021
Despite its dominance in the field of teaching English as a second/foreign language, the implementation of the Communicative Language Teaching (CLT) approach continues to be challenging and problematic. A similar set of constraints – including but not limited to challenges related to educational cultures, contextual and conceptual factors, and lack of authentic materials and facilities – have been reported as factors hindering CLT implementations in many contexts. Language teaching and learning materials and facilities are crucial elements that have been found to affect communicative language teaching implementation. However, the issue of how those material elements can affect CLT implementation has rarely been the focus of research in CLT implementation studies. In this paper, the researcher examines the effect of language teaching and learning materials on teachers’ ability to teach communicatively. Thus, informed by sociomateriality this paper attends to a gap in the literature about how material elements of the curriculum hinder the implementation of the communicative language teaching approach in the Saudi context. The data examined in this study were collected through classroom observations and semi-structured interviews. The analysis of the findings indicated that material elements in the curriculum exerted agency and power, hindering teachers’ ability to teach communicatively and learners’ ability to improve their learning experiences. The report concludes with practical implications related to the complexity of curriculum development and implementation and the emergent nature of such processes as webs of entangled human/nonhuman relations that give rise to education.
Keywords: Actor-network theory, communicative language teaching approach, complexity theory,
curriculum development, language teaching materials, sociomateriality
Cite as Fallatah, R. M.(2021). A Sociomaterial Perspective of the Challenges of Implementing the Communicative Approach in
Saudi State Schools. Arab World English Journal, 12 (4) 302- 316.
Ahmad, S., & Rao, C. (2012). Examination washback effect: Syllabus, teaching methodology and the learners’ communicative competence. Journal of Education and Practice, 3(15), 173-183.
Alakrash, H. (2021). Factors affecting the application of communicative language teaching CLT in Syrian schools. TESOL and Technology Studies, 2(1), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.48185/tts.v2i1.143
Al-Mohanna, A. (2010) English Language Teaching in Saudi Arabian Context: How Communicatively Oriented is it? Journal of King Saud University, 22, 69-88.
Alzaidi, A. (2008). Secondary school head teachers’ job satisfaction in Saudi Arabia: The result of a mixed methods approach. Annual Review of Education, Communication and Language Sciences, 5, 161-185.
Bahanshal, D. A. (2013). The Effect of Large Classes on English Teaching and Learning in Saudi Secondary Schools. English Language Teaching, 6(11), 49-59. http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/elt.v6n11p49
Barad, K. (2007). Meeting the universe halfway. In Meeting the universe halfway. Duke University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9780822388128
Bax, S. (2003). The end of CLT: A context approach to language teaching. ELT Journal, 57(3), 278-87. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/57.3.278
Braidotti, R. (2013). Posthuman humanities. European Educational Research Journal, 12(1), 1-19. https://doi.org/10.2304/eerj.2013.12.1.1
Brown, H. D. (2014). Principles of language learning and teaching (6th edition). Pearson Education.
Butler, Y. G. (2004). What Level of English Proficiency Do Elementary School Teachers Need to Attain to Teach EFL? Case Studies from Korea, Taiwan, and Japan. TESOL Quarterly, 38(2), 245-278. doi:10.2307/3588380
Butler, Y. G. (2009). How Do Teachers Observe and Evaluate Elementary School Students’ Foreign Language Performance? A Case Study from South Korea. TESOL Quarterly, 43(9), 417-444. doi:10.1002/j.1545-7249.2009.tb00243.x
Canagarajah, S. (2018). Materializing ‘competence’: Perspectives from international STEM scholars. The Modern Language Journal, 102(2), 268-291. https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12464
Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis. SAGE.
Chowdhry, M. R. (2003) International TESOL training and EFL contexts: The cultural disillusionment factor. Australian Journal of Education, 47(3), 283-302. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F000494410304700307
Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2018). Research methods in education. Routledge Falmer. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315456539
Didenko, A. V., & Pichugova, I. L. (2016). Post CLT or post-method: Major criticisms of the communicative approach and the definition of the current pedagogy. In SHS Web of Conferences [proceedings]. EDP sciences: Research paradigms transformation in social sciences, Tomsk, Russia. http://earchive.tpu.ru/handle/11683/33068
Douglas Fir Group. (2016). A transdisciplinary framework for SLA in a multilingual world. The Modern Language Journal, 100(S1), 19-47. https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12301
Fenwick, T. (2010), “Rethinking the “thing”: Sociomaterial approaches to understanding and researching learning in work”, Journal of Workplace Learning, 22(1/2), 104-116. https://doi.org/10.1108/13665621011012898
Fenwick, T. (2015). Sociomateriality and learning: A critical approach. The Sage handbook of learning, 83-93.
Fenwick, T., & Dahlgren, M. A. (2015). Towards socio-material approaches in simulation-based education: lessons from complexity theory. Medical Education, 49(4), 359–367. https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.12638
Fenwick, T., & Edwards, R. (2010). Actor-network theory in education. Routledge.
Fenwick, T., Edwards, R., & Sawchuk, P. (2011). Emerging Approaches to Educational Research: Teaching the Sociomaterial. Routledge.
Fenwick, T., & Landri, P. (2012). Materialities, textures and pedagogies: Socio-material assemblages in education. Pedagogy, Culture & Society, 20(1), 1-7. https://doi.org/10.1080/14681366.2012.649421
Fullan, M. (2003). Chapter 3: New lessons for complex change. In M. Fullan (Ed.), Change forces with a vengeance (pp. 21-38). London and New York: Routledge Falmer.
Fullan, M. (2016). The New Meaning of Educational Change. New York: Teachers College Press, Columbia University.
Guerrettaz, A. M., Engman, M. M., & Matsumoto, Y. (2021). Empirically defining language learning and teaching materials in use through sociomaterial perspectives. The Modern Language Journal, 105(S1), 3-20. https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12691|
Harwood, N. (2021). Coda: An expanding research agenda for the use of instructional materials. The Modern Language Journal, 105(S1), 175-184. https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12683
Holliday, A. (1994). Appropriate methodology and social context. Cambridge University Press.
Jacobs, G. M., & Farrell, T. S. (2003). Understanding and implementing the CLT (Communicative Language Teaching) paradigm. RELC Journal, 34(1), 5-30.
Johnson, S. (2001). Emergence: The Connected Lives of Ants, Brains. Cities, and Software. New York: Scribner.
Jin, L., & Cortazzi, M. (2011). Re-evaluating traditional approaches to second language teaching and learning. Handbook of Research in Second Language Teaching and Learning, 2, 558-575.
Karakaş, A. (2013). Is communicative language teaching a panacea in ELT?-Student and teacher perspectives. Journal of Second and Multiple Language Acquisition, 1(1), 1-19.
Kumaravadivelu, B. (2006). Understanding language teaching: From method to postmethod. Routledge.
Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the social: An introduction to actor-network-theory. Oxford university press.
Li, D. (1998). “It’s always more difficult than you plan and imagine”: Teachers’ perceived difficulties in introducing the communicative approach in South Korea. TESOL Quarterly, 32, 677-703. https://10.2307/3588000
Nuby, H. M. M., Rashid, R. A., Rahman, A. R. M. M., & Hasan, M. R. (2020). Communicative language teaching in Bangladeshi rural schools. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 8(2), 622-630. https://10.13189/ujer.2020.080235
Ozsevik, Z. (2010). The use of communicative language teaching (CLT): Turkish EFL teachers’ perceived difficulties in implementing CLT in Turkey [Master’s thesis]. University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
Pachler, N. (2000). Re-examining communicative language teaching. In K. Field (Ed.), Issues in modern foreign languages teaching, 22-37.
Pennycook, A. (2017). Posthumanist applied linguistics. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315457574
Rahmatuzzman, M. (2018). Communicative language teaching (CLT): Theory vs reality in the context of secondary schools in Bangladesh. Journal of Education and Social Sciences, 10(1), 24-32.
Richards, J. C., & Rodgers, T. S. (2014). Approaches and methods in language teaching. Cambridge university press.
Sørensen, E. (2009). The Materiality of Learning: Technology and Knowledge in Educational Practice: Learning in Doing: Social, Cognitive and Computational Perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Sumara, D. J., & Davis, B. A. (2006). Correspondence, coherence, complexity: Theories of learning and their influences on processes of literary composition. English Teaching: Practice and Critique, 5(2), 34-55.
Stebbins, R. A. (2001). Qualitative research methods: Exploratory research in the social sciences. SAGE Publications Ltd. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412984249
Thorne, S. L., Hellermann, J., & Jakonen, T. (2021). Rewilding language education: Emergent assemblages and entangled actions. The Modern Language Journal, 105(S1), 106-125. https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12687
Tomlinson, B., & Masuhara, H. (2018). The complete guide to the theory and practice of materials development for language learning. John Wiley & Sons.
Toohey, K. (2019). The onto-epistemologies of new materialism: Implications for applied linguistics pedagogies and research. Applied Linguistics, 40(6), 937-956. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amy046
Vasilopoulos, G. (2008). Adapting communicative language instruction in Korean universities. The Internet TESOL Journal, 14(8), 16-29. https://doi.org/10.1080/15348458.2015.1019783
Woolgar, S., Coopmans, C., & Neyland, D. (2009). Does STS mean business?. Organization, 16(1), 5-30. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350508408098983
Zhang, L. (2020). An analysis of communicative language teaching approach, an English class and its teaching material. Journal of Advances in Education Research, 5(4), 17