Arab World English Journal (AWEJ) Volume 11. Number2  June 2020                                                          Pp.3- 17

 Full Paper PDF


A Critical Discourse Analysis of Nelson Mandela’s Defense Speech
I am Prepared to Die

Bader Nasser Aldosari
Department of Law, College of Science and Humanities
Prince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz University
Kingdom of Saudi Arabia


This paper attempts to present a Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA) of Nelson Mandela’s defense speech I am prepared to die, which was delivered in 1964 during his trial in what is often called as Rivonia Trial. More specifically, the paper tries to explore the hidden relations of power and ideologies that have been encoded in Mandela’s defense speech. The main research question is: what are the ideological meanings Mandela tries to communicate through his speech, and how are these ideologies conveyed by CDA strategies?  The paper draws on Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA), as discussed in the writings of Fairclough (1989, 2013) and Van Dijk (1993, 2001, 2014). The analysis covers two levels of analysis: the lexical level and the pragmatic level of analysis. Both levels are discussed under the theoretical umbrella of CDA. The paper reveals that Mandela managed, by using specific CDA strategies, to communicate particular ideological meanings that reflect his political stance, as well as his rebellious spirit as the most distinguished revolutionary leader who struggles against racial discrimination in South Africa.
Keywords: critical discourse analysis, court discourse, defense speech, ideology, I am prepared to die, legal discourse, Mandela, racial discrimination

Cite as: Aldosari, B. N. (2020). A Critical Discourse Analysis of Nelson Mandela’s Defense Speech I am Prepared to DieArab World English Journal11 (2) 3- 17.


Blommaert, J., & Bulcaen, C. (2000). Critical discourse analysis. Annual Review of Anthropology29, 447-466.

Brown, P., & Levinson, S. (1987). Politeness: Some universals in language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Coulthard, M., & Johnson, A. (2007).  An introduction to forensic linguistics.  London and New York: Routledge.

Fairclough, N. (2013[1989]). Language and power (2nd ed.). London and New York: Longman.

Flowerdew, J. (2002). Globalization discourse: A view from the east. Discourse & Society. 13 (2), 209-225.

Fowler, R. (1991). Language in the News: Discourse and ideology in the press. London: Routledge.

Fowler, R. (1996). On critical linguistics. In C. Coulthard, & M. Coulthard (Eds.), Texts and practices: Readingin critical discourse analysis (pp. 15-31). London and New York: Routledge.

Fowler, R. & Kress, G. (1979). Critical linguistics. In R. Fowler, R. Hodge, G. Kress & T. Trew (Eds.) Language and control ( pp. 185- 213). London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

Frawley, W. (1992). Linguistic semantics. Associate, Inc.

Gotti, M., &Williams, C. J. (Eds.) (2010). Legal discourse across languages and cultures. Bern, Berlin: Peter Lang.

Khafaga, A. (2017a). Linguistic manipulation of political myth in Margaret Atwood’s The Handmaid’s Tale. International Journal of English Linguistics7(3), 189–200.

Khafaga, A. (2017b). Discourse interpretation: A deconstructive reader-oriented approach to critical discourse analysis. International Journal of Applied Linguistics and English Literature6(2), 138-146.

Khafaga, A. (2019). Linguistic representation of power in Edward Bond’s Lear: A lexico-pragmatic approach to critical discourse analysis. International Journal of English Linguistics9(6), 404-420.

Levinson, S. (1983). Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Mandela, N. (1964). I am prepared to die, Famous Trial. Available at

Mandela, N. (1995). Long walk to freedom: The autobiography of Nelson Mandela. London: Little, Brown and Company.

Mead, R. (1985). Courtroom discourse. Birmingham: University of Birmingham Printing Section.

Mullet, D. (2018). A General Critical Discourse Analysis Framework for Educational Research. Journal of Advanced Academics29 (2), 116-142.

Onwumechili, C., Mponda, S., & Jenkins, J. (2015). A rhetorical analysis of Nelson Mandela’s two key speeches. From the Selected Works of Chukwuka Onwumechili. Available at:

Pinto, D. (2004). Indoctrinating the youth of post-war Spain: A discourse analysis of a Fascist Civics textbook.  Discourse &Society, 15 (5), 649-667.

Posel, D. (2001). Race and common sense: Racial classification in twentieth- century South Africa. African Studies Review44(2), 78-113.

Sampson, A. (2011). Mandela: The authorized biography. London: Harper Collins.

Schaffner, C. (2004). Political discourse analysis from the point of view of translation studies.  Journal of Language and Politics3(1), 117- 150.

Sifianou, M. (1999). Politeness phenomena in England and Greece. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Sornig, K. (1989). Some remarks on linguistic strategies of persuasion. In R. Wodak (Ed.), Language, power and ideology: Studies in political discourse (pp. 95-113). John Benjamins Publishing Company.

Sparks, A. (1996). Tomorrow is another countryThe inside story of South Africa’s Road to change. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Stygall, G. (2012). Discourse in the US courtroom. In P. Tiersma, & L. Solan (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of language and law (pp. 369-380). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Tessuto, G. (Ed.). (2016). Constructing legal discourses and social practices: Issues and perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.

Tiersma, P.  M. (1999). Legal  language. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Van Dijk, T. A. (1989). Structures of discourse and structures of power. In J. A. Anderson (Ed.), Communication Yearbook (Vol. 12, pp. 18-59)Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

Van Dijk, T. A. (1993). Principles of critical discourse analysis. Discourse & Society, 4 (2), 249-283.

Van Dijk, T. A. (1995). Aims of critical discourse analysis. Japanese Discourse, 1, 17-27.

Van Dijk, T. A. (Ed.) (1997). Discourse as interaction in society. In Discourse as Social Interaction: Discourse studies: A multidisciplinary introduction (Vol. 2, pp. 1-37). Sage.

Van Dijk, T. A. (2001). Critical discourse analysis. In D. Tannen, D. Schiffrin, & H. Hamilton, (Eds.) Handbook of discourse analysis (pp. 352-371). Oxford: Blackwell.

Van Dijk, T. A. (2014). Discourse and knowledge: A sociocognitive approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Williams, C., & Tessuto, G. (Eds.) (2013). Language in the negotiation of justice: Contexts, issues and applications. Farnham and Burlington: Ashgate.

Worden, N. (2012). The making of modern South Africa (5th ed.). Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing Limited.


Bader Nasser Aldosari is an Assistant Professor, Department of Law, College of Science Humanities, Prince Sattam bin Abdulaziz University, Saudi Arabia. He got his PhD degree in Law Studies at School of Law, Politics and Sociology at the University of Sussex, UK, in 2018. His research interests include law studies, law and politics, and law and language.