Arab World English Journal (AWEJ) Special Issue on CALL Number 6. July 2020 Pp.38-48
Сomputer Technologies in Acoustic Analysis of English Television Advertising Discourse
Department of Oriental Philology
Kyiv National Linguistic University, Ukraine
Romance and Germanic Languages and Translation Department
National University of Life and Environmental Sciences of Ukraine, Ukraine
Department of Foreign Languages
Kyiv National Linguistic University, Ukraine
Research studies in a variety of linguistic areas indicate that scholars often refer to computer technologies that become popular as a tool to reinforce the findings and provide the validity of the experimental results. This paper discusses the use of computer technologies in the acoustic analysis of speech prosody focused on the English television advertising discourse. The article aims to determine what the main prosodic characteristics of English advertising discourse are, and how they contribute to the maximum influence on the television audience. Therefore, the study relies upon the acoustic analysis using sound processing software WaveLab, Cool Edit Pro, SpectraLAB, Wasp, Sound Forge to ensure the reliability and validity of the obtained results. Moreover, the computer programs used in this research allowed us to measure the pronunciation accuracy and present results based on many experimental data, not only on the assumptions. Besides, the linguistic interpretation of the data of the perceptual and acoustic analysis of the English television advertising discourse prosody proves a strong correlation of these data. The obtained results indicate that detailed analysis of the quantitative prosodic characteristics of speech enables to get a clear picture of the prosodic organization of the English television advertising discourse. The research proves that the prosody of the English advertising discourse closely correlates with its pragmatic potential and some sociolinguistic features, namely, the social status of the viewer, contribute to the maximum influence on the television audience.
Keywords: Acoustic analysis, English advertising discourse, pragmatic potential, prosody, sound processing software
Cite as. Valigura, O., Kozub, L., & Sieriakova, I.(2020). Сomputer Technologies in Acoustic Analysis of English Television Advertising Discourse. Arab World English Journal (AWEJ) Special Issue on CALL (6). 38-48. DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.24093/awej/call6.3
Armstrong, J. S. (2010). Persuasive Advertising. Evidence-Based Principles. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Belch, G., & Belch, M. (2017). Advertising and Promotion: An Integrated Marketing Communications Perspective (11th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill Higher Education.
Conklin, K., Pellicer-Sanchez, A., & Carrol, G. (2018). Eye-Tracking: A Guide for Applied Linguistics Research. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Cool Edit Pro (2020). Developed by Syntrillium Software Corporation. Scottsdale, Arizona.
Crystal, D. (2003). The Cambridge Encyclopedia of the English Language (2nd ed.). Cambridge, UK; New York: Cambridge University Press.
Crystal, D. (2010). The Cambridge Encyclopedia of Language (3rd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Fennis, B. M., & Stroebe, W. (2016). The Psychology of Advertising (2nd ed.). London: Routledge, Taylor and Francis Group.
Féry, C. (2016). Intonation and Prosodic Structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Fischer, K. (2016). Designing Speech for a Recipient. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamin Publishing Company.
Fletcher, W. (2008). Powers of Persuasion: The Inside Story of British Advertising: 1951-2000. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Gélinas-Chebat, C., Chebat, J.-C., & Vaninsky, A. (1996). Voice and Advertising: Effects of Intonation and Intensity of Voice on Source Credibility, Attitudes Toward the Advertised Service and the Intent to Buy. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 83(1), 243-262.
Goddard, A. (2002). The Language of Advertising (2nd ed.). London, New York: Routledge, Taylor and Francis Group.
Hagiwara, R. (2009). How Do I Read a Spectrogram? Winnipeg: University of Manitoba. Available at https://home.cc.umanitoba.ca/~robh/howto.html
Hall, Ch., & Hastings, Ch. (2017). Phonetics, Phonology and Pronunciation for the Language Classroom. London: Red Globe Press.
Kaburise, P. K. (2011). Speech Act Theory and Communication: A Univen Study. Cambridge: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
Phakiti, A., De Costa, P., Plonsky, L., & Starfield, S. (Eds). (2018). The Palgrave Handbook of Applied Linguistics Research Methodology. London, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
Pickering, L. (2018). Discourse Intonation. A Discourse-Pragmatic Approach to Teaching the Pronunciation of English. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Quinn, B. G., & Hannan, E. J. (2012). The Estimation and Tracking of Frequency (Vol. 9). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Rankinen, W. A. (2014). The Sociophonetic and Acoustic Vowel Dynamics of Michigan’s Upper Peninsula English. (Ph.D. Dissertation). Bloomington, Indiana: Indiana University.
Rodero, E., Potter, R. F., Prieto, P. (2017). Pitch Range Variations Improve Cognitive Processing of Audio Messages. Human Communication Research, 43, 397-413.
Singh, R. (2019). Profiling Humans from their Voice. Singapore: Springer.
Sound Forge Pro 13.0. (2019). Advanced Audio Waveform Editor. Developed by MAGIX, Sony Creative Software, Inc.
SpectraLAB: FFT Spectral Analysis System. Version 432. (2008). Sound Technology, Inc., Campbell, CA.
SFS/WASP. Version 1.60. (2019). Developed by Mark Huckvale. University College London.
Thomas, E. R. (2001). An Acoustic Analysis of Vowel Variation in New World English. Durham, NC: Duke University Press for the American Dialect Society.
Wayland, R. (2019). Phonetics: A Practical Introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
WaveLab. Version 8.5. (2019). Audio Editing and Mastering Suite. Developed by Steinberg.
Wichmann, A. (2000). Intonation in Text and Discourse: Beginnings, Middles and Ends. London, New York: Routledge, Taylor and Francis Group.